Through Halting a Harsh Conservative Welfare Policy, This Budget Definitively Outlines How Labour Will Wage the Struggle to Revitalize Britain
Just recently, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, presented a Labour Party budget. The public have been calling for Labour’s purpose and values to be more clearly articulated. Through the choices made – a shift to a fairer tax system, targeting wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, quality public services and the living expenses – we have clearly set out what we believe in.
This is why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are ready for the battles to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.
The Central Political Divide in British Government
The central division in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one hand Labour, who aim to reform it so it benefits everyday working people, and on the opposite side, our opponents, who favor the status quo and the unsuccessful ideology of the past. We must now take on, and prevail in, the argument.
The Tories had 14 years to resolve things and in reality, by every standard, they got much worse. Their ideological austerity and supply-side economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (leaving us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – didn’t work.
Legacy of Failure Under the Previous Administration
Quality of life dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis became entrenched, young people affected by Covid were abandoned. The history of failure continues.
A single budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a long-term plan for renewal and for restructuring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our strategy will reap dividends.
Social Security and Youth Deprivation
Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they didn’t address the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state is forced to paying more to manage the symptoms instead of the solution.
That’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, raising wages and enhanced protections for workers, greatly increasing investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and lowering the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.
Ending the Two-Child Limit
This is also the reason we are completely justified to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.
For eight long years, since it was enacted, low-income families with children have suffered from a cruel social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.
It has only served to push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, ultimately, costs us more, as well as being heartless and immoral.
Real Impact in Communities
I know from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of ending the cap – the real impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed without food and cold, living in cramped, damp homes, parents this Christmas relying on food banks for a modest meal or small gift for their kids.
I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the results of deep poverty.
Long-Term Effects of Youth Hardship
Just a quarter of pupils from the poorest families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with almost 75% among affluent families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face throughout their lives: missed potential, economic struggles and ill health. Children who grew up in poverty are more likely to be unemployed or poor as adults.
Addressing child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy far, far more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.
This is the reason we acted urgently in the budget, despite the very difficult economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees over a hundred additional children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so acting early in the parliament was crucial.
The cap was a totem to 14 years of failed conservative ideology. Now it is abolished.
Equitable Financing for Policies
We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gaming tax, eliminating tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.
Conclusion
Fairness and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a definitive statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will lead as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must reclaim the political platform and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s really wrong with the country and how we are fixing it. We’ve definitely done that this week.
So let’s keep hold of it and win this fight about how we will renew Britain and address the deep inequalities impeding progress.